Salahuddin v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Salahuddin v. Rosenberg

215 A.D.2d 764, 627 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 764 (Salahuddin v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salahuddin v. Rosenberg, 215 A.D.2d 764, 627 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Police Department dated July 14, 1992, denying the petitioner’s application pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law and Public Officers Law §§ 84 through 90 to direct the respondents to turn over certain documents in their possession, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), [765]*765dated May 17, 1993, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Kramer at the Supreme Court. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Police Department dated July 14, 1992, denying the petitioner’s application pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law and Public Officers Law §§ 84 through 90 to direct the respondents to turn over certain documents in their possession, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), [765]*765dated May 17, 1993, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Kramer at the Supreme Court. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 764, 627 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salahuddin-v-rosenberg-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack