Saladworks v. WCAB of: Uninsured Employers
This text of Saladworks v. WCAB of: Uninsured Employers (Saladworks v. WCAB of: Uninsured Employers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA M.D. Appeal Dkt. MIDDLE DISTRICT 52 MAP 2016
SALADWORKS, LLC AND WESCO : No. 971 MAL 2015 INSURANCE COMPANY : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v. : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (GAUDIOSO AND UNINSURED : EMPLOYERS GUARANTY FUND) : : : PETITION OF: UNINSURED : EMPLOYERS GUARANTY FUND :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is whether a franchisor may be subject to
liability as a statutory employer under Section 302(a) of the Workers’ Compensation
Act?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Saladworks v. WCAB of: Uninsured Employers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saladworks-v-wcab-of-uninsured-employers-pa-2016.