Salaam v. Taylor

Fourth Circuit

Salaam v. Taylor

448 F. App'x 406

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 4, 2011

DocketNo. 11-1682

StatusPublished

This text of 448 F. App'x 406 (Salaam v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salaam v. Taylor, 448 F. App'x 406 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sulyaman Al Islam Wa Salaam appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief without prejudice on Salaam’s civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Salaam v. Taylor, No. 3:11-cv-00935-CMC (D.S.C. June 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sulyaman Al Islam Wa Salaam appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief without prejudice on Salaam’s civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Salaam v. Taylor, No. 3:11-cv-00935-CMC (D.S.C. June 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 F. App'x 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salaam-v-taylor-ca4-2011.