Salaam v. City of New York
This text of 226 A.D.2d 173 (Salaam v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Hansel McGee, J., and a jury), entered on or about March 2,1995, apportioning liability 100% against defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Legally sufficient evidence of defendants’ constructive notice of a dangerous condition was provided by the uncontroverted testimony at trial that the puddle in which plaintiffs slipped was 21h feet by 21/2 feet and was dirty with numerous footprints, both wet and dry, leading out of it in all directions (see, Negri v Stop & Shop, 65 NY2d 625; Catanzaro v King Kullen Grocery Co., 194 AD2d 584). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D.2d 173, 640 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salaam-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1996.