Saks v. Schley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Saks v. Schley

246 A.D. 801

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 801 (Saks v. Schley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saks v. Schley, 246 A.D. 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The complaint alleges that plaintiff at the special instance and request of defendant Helen Schley delivered to her merchandise at the agreed price and reasonable value of $854.35; that -Helen Schley pledged the credit of her husband, Charles E. Schley; that thereafter defendant Charles E. Schley disclaimed liability, and that plaintiff was in doubt as to which [802]*802of the said defendants was responsible for the purchases so made. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against defendant Helen Schley and with costs to defendant Charles E. Schley against the plaintiff. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent from the affirmance of the judgment and the order in so far as they impose costs against defendant Helen Schley.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The complaint alleges that plaintiff at the special instance and request of defendant Helen Schley delivered to her merchandise at the agreed price and reasonable value of $854.35; that -Helen Schley pledged the credit of her husband, Charles E. Schley; that thereafter defendant Charles E. Schley disclaimed liability, and that plaintiff was in doubt as to which [802]*802of the said defendants was responsible for the purchases so made. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against defendant Helen Schley and with costs to defendant Charles E. Schley against the plaintiff. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent from the affirmance of the judgment and the order in so far as they impose costs against defendant Helen Schley.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saks-v-schley-nyappdiv-1935.