Saks & Co. v. District of Columbia
263 F. 1020, 49 App. D.C. 276, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2125
This text of 263 F. 1020 (Saks & Co. v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Saks & Co. v. District of Columbia, 263 F. 1020, 49 App. D.C. 276, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2125 (D.C. Cir. 1920).
Opinion
As the facts here do not differ materially from those in R. P. Andrews Paper Co., a Corporation, v. District of Columbia, 49 App. D. C.-, 263 Fed. 1017, just decided by this court, our ruling must be the-same as in that case. The judgment, therefore, is reversed and case remanded, for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
SMYTH, Chief Justice, dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
R. P. Andrews Paper Co. v. District of Columbia
263 F. 1017 (D.C. Circuit, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
263 F. 1020, 49 App. D.C. 276, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saks-co-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1920.