Sakin v. London, New York, Shanghai Trading Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sakin v. London, New York, Shanghai Trading Corp.

277 A.D.2d 977

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 977 (Sakin v. London, New York, Shanghai Trading Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sakin v. London, New York, Shanghai Trading Corp., 277 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

The provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1 et seq.), constituted a bar to the maintenance of the action while plaintiff was a resident of enemy-occupied territory. As a consequence the Statute of Limitations was tolled during that period (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 24, 27, 28-a). Accordingly, the judgment and orders appealed from are unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and plaintiff’s application for leave to serve an amended complaint is granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1 et seq.), constituted a bar to the maintenance of the action while plaintiff was a resident of enemy-occupied territory. As a consequence the Statute of Limitations was tolled during that period (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 24, 27, 28-a). Accordingly, the judgment and orders appealed from are unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and plaintiff’s application for leave to serve an amended complaint is granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sakin-v-london-new-york-shanghai-trading-corp-nyappdiv-1950.