Sakic v. Centaur Building Services

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sakic v. Centaur Building Services

341 S.W.3d 130, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 585, 2011 WL 1532031

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 19, 2011

DocketED 95610, ED 95618

StatusPublished

This text of 341 S.W.3d 130 (Sakic v. Centaur Building Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sakic v. Centaur Building Services, 341 S.W.3d 130, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 585, 2011 WL 1532031 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Edin Sakic, appeals from two decisions by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission that dismissed claimant’s applications for review from two awards by an administrative law judge. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The decisions are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Edin Sakic, appeals from two decisions by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission that dismissed claimant’s applications for review from two awards by an administrative law judge. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The decisions are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 S.W.3d 130, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 585, 2011 WL 1532031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sakic-v-centaur-building-services-moctapp-2011.