Sakhorn Khamsiry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 4, 2014·No. 04-13-00575-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00575-CR

Sakhorn KHAMSIRY, Appellant

v. The The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. A08-393 Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 4, 2014

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED

Sakhorn Khamsiry appeals the judgment convicting him of possession of a controlled

substance and sentencing him to twenty-five years in prison. Khamsiry’s court-appointed

appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which he concludes this appeal is

frivolous and without merit.

The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v.

State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. 04-13-00575-CR

App. 1969). Appellant was provided a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was informed

of his right to review the record and file his own brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with

counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Khamsiry’s counsel and affirm

the trial court’s judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio

1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). 1

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Do not publish

1 No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Khamsiry wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this opinion is rendered or the last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sakhorn Khamsiry v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Sakhorn Khamsiry v. State (Sakhorn Khamsiry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Bruns v. State
924 S.W.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Nichols v. State
954 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)