Sakal v. Association of Apartment Owners of Hawaiian Monarch
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
22-MAY-2019
09:57 AM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
CHRISTIAN SAKAL, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF HAWAIIAN MONARCH, JONAH SCOTT KOGEN, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees; K&F 1984 LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 14-1-1118)
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Association of Apartment Owners of Hawaiian Monarch’s Motion for Reconsideration and Supplementation of the Record (Motion), filed on May 16, 2019, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is dismissed in part and denied in part. As to the request for reconsideration the Motion is dismissed. See HRAP Rule 40.1(h) (“Neither acceptance nor rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in the supreme court. The rejection of an application for
certiorari shall be final.”). As to the request to supplement the record, the Motion is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 22, 2019.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sakal v. Association of Apartment Owners of Hawaiian Monarch (Sakal v. Association of Apartment Owners of Hawaiian Monarch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.