Sakal v. Association of Apartment Owners of Hawaiian Monarch

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 2019·No. SCWC-15-0000529·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

22-MAY-2019

09:57 AM

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

CHRISTIAN SAKAL, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF HAWAIIAN MONARCH, JONAH SCOTT KOGEN, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees; K&F 1984 LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 14-1-1118)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Association of Apartment Owners of Hawaiian Monarch’s Motion for Reconsideration and Supplementation of the Record (Motion), filed on May 16, 2019, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is dismissed in part and denied in part. As to the request for reconsideration the Motion is dismissed. See HRAP Rule 40.1(h) (“Neither acceptance nor rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari shall be subject to a motion for reconsideration in the supreme court. The rejection of an application for

certiorari shall be final.”). As to the request to supplement the record, the Motion is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 22, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sakal v. Association of Apartment Owners of Hawaiian Monarch, (haw 2019).

Sakal v. Association of Apartment Owners of Hawaiian Monarch (Sakal v. Association of Apartment Owners of Hawaiian Monarch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.