Sajor v. Ampol, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sajor v. Ampol, Inc.

249 A.D. 852, 294 N.Y.S. 342, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9994

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sajor v. Ampol, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 242 A.D. 655 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 22, 1937·Published

Opinion

In an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of capital stock of defendant corporation, represented by a signed subscription therefor, and to recover the money paid thereon, on the ground that the contract was illegal and void under the provisions of section 359-e of the General Business Law (Art. 23-A, sometimes called the Martin Act), judgment for plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of capital stock of defendant corporation, represented by a signed subscription therefor, and to recover the money paid thereon, on the ground that the contract was illegal and void under the provisions of section 359-e of the General Business Law (Art. 23-A, sometimes called the Martin Act), judgment for plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.

Sajor v. Ampol, Inc., 249 A.D. 852, 294 N.Y.S. 342, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

249 A.D. 852 (Sajor v. Ampol, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.