Saiyed v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car
This text of Saiyed v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car (Saiyed v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1137
IFTIKHAR H. SAIYED,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-01147-JCC-JFA)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Iftikhar H. Saiyed, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Iftikhar H. Saiyed appeals the district court’s order
denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss and granting Defendant’s
summary judgment motion on his race discrimination and
retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
Saiyed v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car, No. 1:08-cv-01147-JCC-JFA (E.D.
Va. Jan. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Saiyed v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saiyed-v-enterprise-rent-a-car-ca4-2009.