Saiyed v. 3-S Network Inc.

627 F. App'x 187
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2015·No. No. 15-1823·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Iftikhar H. Saiyed appeals the district court’s order dismissing, without prejudice to any state law claims Saiyed may have against Defendant 3-S Network Inc. (“3-S”), his civil action alleging 3-S wrongfully terminated his employment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible [188] error. Accordingly, we deny Saiyed’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. Saiyed v. 3-S Network Inc., No. 3:14-cv-00528-REP (E.D. Va. June 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saiyed v. 3-S Network Inc., 627 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2015).

627 F. App'x 187 (Saiyed v. 3-S Network Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.