Saita

Court of Claims

Saita

201 Ct. Cl. 895, 1973 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 63, 1973 WL 4995

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMay 18, 1973

DocketNo. 180-72

StatusPublished

This text of 201 Ct. Cl. 895 (Saita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saita, 201 Ct. Cl. 895, 1973 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 63, 1973 WL 4995 (cc 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff, a supervisory production controller, GS-1152-12, with the Defense Personnel Support Center, Defense Supply Agency, seeks to have his position reclassified as GS-1152-13, and also seeks a monetary recovery measured by the difference between his salary as GS-12 and the salary that he would have earned if his position had been reclassified as GS-13 on August 21,1970. This case came before the court on defendant’s and plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, the briefs of the parties and oral argument of counsel, the court concluded that plaintiff has failed to show a violation of any applicable statute or regulation or any abuse of discretion by the Civil Service Commission and that he is thus not entitled to recover. On May 18, 1973, by order, the court denied plaintiff’s motion, granted defendant’s motion, and dismissed the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff, a supervisory production controller, GS-1152-12, with the Defense Personnel Support Center, Defense Supply Agency, seeks to have his position reclassified as GS-1152-13, and also seeks a monetary recovery measured by the difference between his salary as GS-12 and the salary that he would have earned if his position had been reclassified as GS-13 on August 21,1970. This case came before the court on defendant’s and plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, the briefs of the parties and oral argument of counsel, the court concluded that plaintiff has failed to show a violation of any applicable statute or regulation or any abuse of discretion by the Civil Service Commission and that he is thus not entitled to recover. On May 18, 1973, by order, the court denied plaintiff’s motion, granted defendant’s motion, and dismissed the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 Ct. Cl. 895, 1973 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 63, 1973 WL 4995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saita-cc-1973.