Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sainval v. State

Sainval v. State

909 So. 2d 605, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14093, 2005 WL 2138707
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 7, 2005
DocketNo. 4D05-2340
StatusPublished

This text of 909 So. 2d 605 (Sainval v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sainval v. State, 909 So. 2d 605, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14093, 2005 WL 2138707 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion because the issue involved, the waiver of additional jail credit, requires an evidentiary hearing. This af-firmance is without prejudice to Sainval filing a motion seeking additional jail credit pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, within the time remaining under that rule. Autrey v. State, 736 So.2d 94 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Autrey v. State
736 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
909 So. 2d 605, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14093, 2005 WL 2138707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sainval-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.