Saintyl v. State
114 So. 3d 1134, 2013 WL 3179908, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9944
This text of 114 So. 3d 1134 (Saintyl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Saintyl v. State, 114 So. 3d 1134, 2013 WL 3179908, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9944 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences but remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the judgment. The judgment should reflect that the applicable subsection of the attempt statute is section 777.04(4)(c).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 1134, 2013 WL 3179908, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saintyl-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.