Saintsing v. Steinbach Co.
66 A.2d 158, 2 N.J. 304, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 263
Opinion
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Waoheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saintsing v. Steinbach Co., 66 A.2d 158, 2 N.J. 304, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 263 (N.J. 1949).
66 A.2d 158 (Saintsing v. Steinbach Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hicks's Case
820 N.E.2d 826 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2005)
(2003)
88 Op. Att'y Gen. 120 (Maryland Attorney General Reports, 2003)
Mikkelsen v. NL Industries
370 A.2d 5 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)
Strzelecki v. Johns-Manville
322 A.2d 168 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)
Barbarise v. Overlook Hospital Assn.
211 A.2d 817 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.
164 A.2d 792 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.
147 A.2d 783 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1959)
King v. Arthur
96 S.E.2d 846 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Ducharme v. Columbia Engineering Co.
106 A.2d 23 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Moosebrugger v. Prospect Presbyterian Church
96 A.2d 401 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co.
77 A.2d 467 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Waskevitz v. Clifton Paper Board Co.
71 A.2d 646 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)