Saintloit v. Sainteloit

164 So. 3d 772, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8044, 2015 WL 3397360
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 27, 2015
DocketNo. 1D15-1053
StatusPublished

This text of 164 So. 3d 772 (Saintloit v. Sainteloit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saintloit v. Sainteloit, 164 So. 3d 772, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8044, 2015 WL 3397360 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Thomas v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 74 So.3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (stating that absent a showing that an express and distinct demand for performance was made, mandamus will not lie to compel a court to rule on a pleading in a civil matter); accord Al-Halkim v. State, 783 So.2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

BENTON, CLARK, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Al-Hakim v. State
783 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Thomas v. State, Department of Revenue
74 So. 3d 145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 So. 3d 772, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8044, 2015 WL 3397360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saintloit-v-sainteloit-fladistctapp-2015.