Saintil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Saintil v. State

427 So. 2d 309, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27940

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 1983·No. No. 82-2438·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Yeargin v. State, 277 So.2d 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Chisholm v. State, 220 So.2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Thomas v. State, 172 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Yeargin v. State, 277 So.2d 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Chisholm v. State, 220 So.2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Thomas v. State, 172 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).

Saintil v. State, 427 So. 2d 309, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27940 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

427 So. 2d 309 (Saintil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related