Saintes v. Social Security Administration

District Court, W.D. Louisiana·Decided July 17, 2025·No. 6:24-cv-01604·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

KENNETH SAINTES CASE NO. 6:24-CV-01604 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS SOCIAL SECURITY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL B. ADMINISTRATION WHITEHURST

JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, noting the absence of any objection, and having determined that the findings and recommendations are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that, consistent with the Report and Recommendation, the Commissioner’s decision should be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ' More particularly, the Commissioner is instructed to again evaluate the claimant’s residual functional capacity, and to specifically consider whether he qualifies for a sedentary RFC in light of his need for a cane and Dr. Rosenzweig’s opinions. The claimant

A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5" Cir. 1993).

should be afforded the opportunity to submit updated medical evidence and to testify at another hearing. THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, on this lot, of Soy , 2025.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saintes v. Social Security Administration, (W.D. La. 2025).

Saintes v. Social Security Administration (Saintes v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related