Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Saintelus v. State

Saintelus v. State

864 So. 2d 1209, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 429, 2004 WL 89839
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Saintelus v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12383 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 2004·No. No. 4D03-3004·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief. As the state points out, and appellant concedes, the motion did not contain a proper oath. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c). Appellant may raise his claims in [1210]*1210a motion containing a proper oath within 30 days of the date of this opinion.

POLEN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saintelus v. State, 864 So. 2d 1209, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 429, 2004 WL 89839 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

864 So. 2d 1209 (Saintelus v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.