Saint Louis University v. Masonic Temple Ass'n of St. Louis

269 S.W.3d 447, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1255, 2008 WL 4205728
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2008·No. ED 90933·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Masonic Temple Association of St. Louis (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment assessing costs against it in favor of Saint Louis University (hereinafter, “SLU”). Appellant raises two points on appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in awarding SLU its deposition costs because it had no jurisdiction to do so and if the trial court did have jurisdiction, its award exceeded statutory limits.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saint Louis University v. Masonic Temple Ass'n of St. Louis, 269 S.W.3d 447, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1255, 2008 WL 4205728 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

269 S.W.3d 447 (Saint Louis University v. Masonic Temple Ass'n of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.