Sain v. Cypress Creek Drainage District
This text of 268 U.S. 675 (Sain v. Cypress Creek Drainage District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Morrison v. Watson, 154 U. S. 111, 115; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 86; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 192; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53. Mr. Lamar Williamson for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Charles T. Coleman for defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 U.S. 675, 45 S. Ct. 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sain-v-cypress-creek-drainage-district-scotus-1925.