Sain v. Cypress Creek Drainage District
268 U.S. 675, 45 S. Ct. 508
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Morrison v. Watson, 154 U. S. 111, 115; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 86; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 192; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53. Mr. Lamar Williamson for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Charles T. Coleman for defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sain v. Cypress Creek Drainage District, 268 U.S. 675, 45 S. Ct. 508 (1925).
268 U.S. 675 (Sain v. Cypress Creek Drainage District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
California Powder Works v. Davis
151 U.S. 389 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Morrison v. Watson
154 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Harding v. Illinois
196 U.S. 78 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McDonald
214 U.S. 191 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. City of Cleveland
235 U.S. 50 (Supreme Court, 1914)