Sailly v. Hutton

New York Supreme Court

Sailly v. Hutton

6 Wend. 508

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 23, 1830

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 6 Wend. 508 (Sailly v. Hutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sailly v. Hutton, 6 Wend. 508 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

Pincite

Opinion

The venue will not be changed on the application of one defendant, where there are several defendants in a cause.

Motion to change the venue from Clinton to Franklin. The defendants defend separately. Cleaveland has plead to issue, and Hutton has obtained an order enlarging the time to plead, and alone applies to change the venue. The plaintiff objects that one defendant cannot ask for a change of the venue, unless the other joins in the application. The objection was sustained, and the motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The venue will not be changed on the application of one defendant, where there are several defendants in a cause.

Motion to change the venue from Clinton to Franklin. The defendants defend separately. Cleaveland has plead to issue, and Hutton has obtained an order enlarging the time to plead, and alone applies to change the venue. The plaintiff objects that one defendant cannot ask for a change of the venue, unless the other joins in the application. The objection was sustained, and the motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Wend. 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sailly-v-hutton-nysupct-1830.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack