SAIF v. Strohm

258 P.3d 7, 242 Or. App. 681

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 18, 2011·No. 0901260 A144952·Published

Opinion

258 P.3d 7 (2011) 242 Or. App. 681

In the Matter of the Compensation of Mary Jo Strohm, Claimant.
SAIF CORPORATION; and Gowdy Brothers Electric, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
Mary Jo STROHM, Respondent.

0901260; A144952.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted April 11, 2011. Decided May 18, 2011.

David L. Runner, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.

Philip H. Garrow filed the brief for respondent.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. SAIF v. DeLeon, 241 Or.App. 614, 251 P.3d 794 (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

258 P.3d 7 (2011) 242 Or. App. 681

In the Matter of the Compensation of Mary Jo Strohm, Claimant.
SAIF CORPORATION; and Gowdy Brothers Electric, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
Mary Jo STROHM, Respondent.

0901260; A144952.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted April 11, 2011. Decided May 18, 2011.

David L. Runner, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.

Philip H. Garrow filed the brief for respondent.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. SAIF v. DeLeon, 241 Or.App. 614, 251 P.3d 794 (2011).

SAIF v. Strohm, 258 P.3d 7, 242 Or. App. 681 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

258 P.3d 7 (SAIF v. Strohm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SAIF Corp. v. DeLeon

251 P.3d 794 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)

SAIF Corp. v. Strohm

258 P.3d 7 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)