SAIF v. Strohm
258 P.3d 7, 242 Or. App. 681
This text of 258 P.3d 7 (SAIF v. Strohm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
SAIF v. Strohm, 258 P.3d 7, 242 Or. App. 681 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Compensation of Mary Jo Strohm, Claimant.
SAIF CORPORATION; and Gowdy Brothers Electric, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
Mary Jo STROHM, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
David L. Runner, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.
Philip H. Garrow filed the brief for respondent.
Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed. SAIF v. DeLeon, 241 Or.App. 614, 251 P.3d 794 (2011).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
SAIF Corp. v. DeLeon
251 P.3d 794 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
SAIF Corp. v. Strohm
258 P.3d 7 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
258 P.3d 7, 242 Or. App. 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saif-v-strohm-orctapp-2011.