SAIF Corp. v. Wilson
This text of 770 P.2d 972 (SAIF Corp. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board determining that claimant is entitled to an award of attorney fees under ORS 656.262(10)1 and ORS 656.382(1),2 because employer failed to close claimant’s non-disabling claim. Claimant was injured at work on January 8, 1981. Employer promptly accepted the claim as nondisabling and paid medical bills. However, employer never closed the claim as required by former ORS 656.268(3).
ORS 656.262(10) and ORS 656.382(1) authorize the assessment of penalties and attorney fees if an employer resists payment of compensation or otherwise unreasonably causes a delay in payment of compensation. There is no contention here that employer refused to pay or delayed the payment of compensation. In the two cases on which the Board relied, Georgia Pacific v. Awmiller, 64 Or App 56, 59, 666 P2d 1379 (1983), and Lester v. Weyerhaeuser, 70 Or App 307, 689 P2d 342, rev den 298 Or 427 (1984), holding that a penalty may be assessed for an employer’s failure to seek claim closure, the failure resulted in a delayed payment of compensation. Here, there has been no delay in payment of compensation; accordingly, there is no statutory authority on which a penalty on attorney fees may be assessed.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
770 P.2d 972, 95 Or. App. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saif-corp-v-wilson-orctapp-1989.