Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Saif Corp. v. Sledd

Saif Corp. v. Sledd

984 P.2d 952, 162 Or. App. 295, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1391, 1999 WL 588190
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 4, 1999
DocketWCB 96-06662; CA A99152
StatusPublished

This text of 984 P.2d 952 (Saif Corp. v. Sledd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saif Corp. v. Sledd, 984 P.2d 952, 162 Or. App. 295, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1391, 1999 WL 588190 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioners SAIF Corporation and Jensen Tree Service seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed an award of temporary disability compensation for a period beginning nearly three years before it was authorized by claimant’s attending physician.1 The Board adopted and affirmed the administrative law judge’s order, which was based on the Board’s decision in an earlier case, Kenneth P. Bundy, 48 Van Natta 2501 (1996). However, this court has since reversed Bundy. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44, 978 P2d 385, rev dismissed 329 Or 503 (1999). We remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy.

Remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy
978 P.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)
Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy
991 P.2d 1058 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
984 P.2d 952, 162 Or. App. 295, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1391, 1999 WL 588190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saif-corp-v-sledd-orctapp-1999.