Saif Corp. v. Sledd

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Saif Corp. v. Sledd

984 P.2d 952, 162 Or. App. 295, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1391, 1999 WL 588190

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 4, 1999·No. WCB 96-06662; CA A99152·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioners SAIF Corporation and Jensen Tree Service seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed an award of temporary disability compensation for a period beginning nearly three years before it was authorized by claimant’s attending physician.¹ The Board adopted and affirmed the administrative law judge’s order, which was based on the Board’s decision in an earlier case, Kenneth P. Bundy, 48 Van Natta 2501 (1996). However, this court has since reversed Bundy. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44, 978 P2d 385, rev dismissed 329 Or 503 (1999). We remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy.

Remanded for reconsideration.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioners SAIF Corporation and Jensen Tree Service seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed an award of temporary disability compensation for a period beginning nearly three years before it was authorized by claimant’s attending physician.¹ The Board adopted and affirmed the administrative law judge’s order, which was based on the Board’s decision in an earlier case, Kenneth P. Bundy, 48 Van Natta 2501 (1996). However, this court has since reversed Bundy. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44, 978 P2d 385, rev dismissed 329 Or 503 (1999). We remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy.

Remanded for reconsideration.

Footnotes

Saif Corp. v. Sledd, 984 P.2d 952, 162 Or. App. 295, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1391, 1999 WL 588190 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

984 P.2d 952 (Saif Corp. v. Sledd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related