Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/SAIF Corp. v. Rolen (In re Rolen)

SAIF Corp. v. Rolen (In re Rolen)

433 P.3d 760, 294 Or. App. 258
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 26, 2018·No. A164521·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*761Affirmed. Barrett Business Services v. Hames , 130 Or. App. 190, 193, 881 P.2d 816, rev. den. , 320 Or. 492 (1994) (when a new injury is the direct result of reasonable and necessary treatment of a compensable injury, the compensable injury is the major contributing cause of the new injury, which is compensable as a consequential condition).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAIF Corp. v. Rolen (In re Rolen), 433 P.3d 760, 294 Or. App. 258 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

433 P.3d 760 (SAIF Corp. v. Rolen (In re Rolen)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barrett Business Services v. Hames
881 P.2d 816 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)