Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/SAIF Corp. v. Rolen (In re Rolen)

SAIF Corp. v. Rolen (In re Rolen)

433 P.3d 760, 294 Or. App. 258
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 26, 2018
DocketA164521
StatusPublished

This text of 433 P.3d 760 (SAIF Corp. v. Rolen (In re Rolen)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SAIF Corp. v. Rolen (In re Rolen), 433 P.3d 760, 294 Or. App. 258 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*761Affirmed. Barrett Business Services v. Hames , 130 Or. App. 190, 193, 881 P.2d 816, rev. den. , 320 Or. 492 (1994) (when a new injury is the direct result of reasonable and necessary treatment of a compensable injury, the compensable injury is the major contributing cause of the new injury, which is compensable as a consequential condition).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrett Business Services v. Hames
881 P.2d 816 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 P.3d 760, 294 Or. App. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saif-corp-v-rolen-in-re-rolen-orctapp-2018.