SAIF Corp. v. Mackey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

SAIF Corp. v. Mackey

901 P.2d 920, 136 Or. App. 540, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1191

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 6, 1995·No. 93-03321; CA A85053·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board assessing a penalty for its unreasonable delay in accepting claimant’s claim. Claimant cross-petitions from the Board’s order denying his claim for attorney fees.

The statutes pertinent to this petition and cross-petition have been amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332. Because the amended version of the statutes is applicable here, we remand for reconsideration in the light of the new law. Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration on petition and on cross-petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board assessing a penalty for its unreasonable delay in accepting claimant’s claim. Claimant cross-petitions from the Board’s order denying his claim for attorney fees.

The statutes pertinent to this petition and cross-petition have been amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332. Because the amended version of the statutes is applicable here, we remand for reconsideration in the light of the new law. Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration on petition and on cross-petition.

SAIF Corp. v. Mackey, 901 P.2d 920, 136 Or. App. 540, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1191 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

901 P.2d 920 (SAIF Corp. v. Mackey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related