SAIF Corp. v. Carranza-Romero

987 P.2d 529, 161 Or. App. 658, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1215
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 7, 1999·No. WCB 97-05388; CA A101469·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed an award of temporary disability compensation. The Board relied on its decision in Kenneth P. Bundy, 48 Van Natta 2501 (1996), which we subsequently reversed. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44, 978 P2d 385 (1999). Whether our decision in Bundy will affect the determination of claimant’s entitlement to temporary disability compensation is not apparent from the record before us. Consequently, we remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy.

Remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAIF Corp. v. Carranza-Romero, 987 P.2d 529, 161 Or. App. 658, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1215 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

987 P.2d 529 (SAIF Corp. v. Carranza-Romero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy
978 P.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)