Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/SAIF Corp. v. Carranza-Romero

SAIF Corp. v. Carranza-Romero

987 P.2d 529, 161 Or. App. 658, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1215
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 7, 1999
DocketWCB 97-05388; CA A101469
StatusPublished

This text of 987 P.2d 529 (SAIF Corp. v. Carranza-Romero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SAIF Corp. v. Carranza-Romero, 987 P.2d 529, 161 Or. App. 658, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1215 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed an award of temporary disability compensation. The Board relied on its decision in Kenneth P. Bundy, 48 Van Natta 2501 (1996), which we subsequently reversed. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44, 978 P2d 385 (1999). Whether our decision in Bundy will affect the determination of claimant’s entitlement to temporary disability compensation is not apparent from the record before us. Consequently, we remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy.

Remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy
978 P.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
987 P.2d 529, 161 Or. App. 658, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saif-corp-v-carranza-romero-orctapp-1999.