Saif Corp. v. Bowen
887 P.2d 787, 320 Or. 501, 1995 Ore. LEXIS 5
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided January 27, 1995·No. WCB 91-15616; CA A77263; SC S41270·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of Martin v. City of Albany, 320 Or 175, 880 P2d 926 (1994), and Niccum v. South Coast Lumber Co., 320 Or 189, 880 P2d 923 (1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saif Corp. v. Bowen, 887 P.2d 787, 320 Or. 501, 1995 Ore. LEXIS 5 (Or. 1995).
887 P.2d 787 (Saif Corp. v. Bowen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SAIF Corp. v. Bowen
901 P.2d 925 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)