SAIF Corp. v. Atchley

891 P.2d 1385, 133 Or. App. 596, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 507
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 22, 1995·No. 91-05626; CA A76029·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration. SAIF v. Atchley, 320 Or 405, 884 P2d 867 (1994). The Board’s order awarded claimant attorney fees for SAIF’s late payment of claimant’s medical services claim. SAIF concedes that in the light of SAIF v. Allen, 320 Or 192, 881 P2d 773 (1994), claimant is entitled to attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1), because its late payment of claimant’s medical services claim constituted a de facto denial and the record does not establish that the denial was limited to the amount of compensation due.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAIF Corp. v. Atchley, 891 P.2d 1385, 133 Or. App. 596, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 507 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

891 P.2d 1385 (SAIF Corp. v. Atchley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saif Corp. v. Allen
881 P.2d 773 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)
Saif Corp. v. Atchley
884 P.2d 867 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)