SAIF Corp. v. Atchley

891 P.2d 1385, 133 Or. App. 596, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 507
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 22, 1995
Docket91-05626; CA A76029
StatusPublished

This text of 891 P.2d 1385 (SAIF Corp. v. Atchley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SAIF Corp. v. Atchley, 891 P.2d 1385, 133 Or. App. 596, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 507 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration. SAIF v. Atchley, 320 Or 405, 884 P2d 867 (1994). The Board’s order awarded claimant attorney fees for SAIF’s late payment of claimant’s medical services claim. SAIF concedes that in the light of SAIF v. Allen, 320 Or 192, 881 P2d 773 (1994), claimant is entitled to attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1), because its late payment of claimant’s medical services claim constituted a de facto denial and the record does not establish that the denial was limited to the amount of compensation due.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saif Corp. v. Allen
881 P.2d 773 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)
Saif Corp. v. Atchley
884 P.2d 867 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
891 P.2d 1385, 133 Or. App. 596, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saif-corp-v-atchley-orctapp-1995.