Sahu v. Minneapolis Community & Technical College

674 F. App'x 606
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 2017
Docket16-1741
StatusUnpublished

This text of 674 F. App'x 606 (Sahu v. Minneapolis Community & Technical College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sahu v. Minneapolis Community & Technical College, 674 F. App'x 606 (8th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Girish Sahu appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VI, and state law. He also has moved for sanctions in this court. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

A de novo review of the record reveals dismissal was proper. See Adams v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 813 F.3d 1151, 1154 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review of grant of motion to dismiss). As to Sahu’s motion for sanctions, there is no indication that defendants acted in bad faith.

The judgment is affirmed and Sahu’s motion is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Patrick J. Schütz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael Adams v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co
813 F.3d 1151 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 F. App'x 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sahu-v-minneapolis-community-technical-college-ca8-2017.