Sahr v. City of North Tonawanda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sahr v. City of North Tonawanda

254 A.D. 645, 3 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6861

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 645 (Sahr v. City of North Tonawanda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sahr v. City of North Tonawanda, 254 A.D. 645, 3 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and order granted awarding petitioners the sum of 83,000. Certain findings of fact and conclusion of law disapproved and reversed, and new finding of fact and conclusion of law made. Memorandum: We do not regard it as fatal to recovery that decedent caused the fire by his own negligence, or that no fire alarm had been turned in, or that decedent may have been actuated, in part, by the personal motive to save the life he had placed in peril. (Matter of Hommel v. Town of Saugerties, 253 App. Div, 84.) The duty to save a life threatened by fire is one of the important duties of a fireman, and a fire alarm was not needed to warn decedent of a fire of which he had actual notice. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The order dismisses the petition in a proceeding to recover award for death of volunteer fireman.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and order granted awarding petitioners the sum of 83,000. Certain findings of fact and conclusion of law disapproved and reversed, and new finding of fact and conclusion of law made. Memorandum: We do not regard it as fatal to recovery that decedent caused the fire by his own negligence, or that no fire alarm had been turned in, or that decedent may have been actuated, in part, by the personal motive to save the life he had placed in peril. (Matter of Hommel v. Town of Saugerties, 253 App. Div, 84.) The duty to save a life threatened by fire is one of the important duties of a fireman, and a fire alarm was not needed to warn decedent of a fire of which he had actual notice. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The order dismisses the petition in a proceeding to recover award for death of volunteer fireman.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 645, 3 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sahr-v-city-of-north-tonawanda-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack