Sahm v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sahm v. State

1914 OK CR 201, 143 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 685, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 96

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 7, 1914

DocketNo. A-2341.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 201 (Sahm v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sahm v. State, 1914 OK CR 201, 143 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 685, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 96 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

*686 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was, in the court below, convicted of the offense of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor. The jury assessed his fine at one hundred dollars and thirty days’ confinement in the county jail. Judgment and sentence was entered on the 9th day of July, 1914. An appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on September 22nd, 1914, petition in error with ease-made. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that said appeal was not filed in this count until long after the expiration of the time allowed by law within which to take an appeal and that no order of the court appears in the record extending the statutory time. No response to the motion to dismiss has been filed. The motion to dismiss the purported appeal is, therefore, sustained, and the case remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*686 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was, in the court below, convicted of the offense of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor. The jury assessed his fine at one hundred dollars and thirty days’ confinement in the county jail. Judgment and sentence was entered on the 9th day of July, 1914. An appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on September 22nd, 1914, petition in error with ease-made. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that said appeal was not filed in this count until long after the expiration of the time allowed by law within which to take an appeal and that no order of the court appears in the record extending the statutory time. No response to the motion to dismiss has been filed. The motion to dismiss the purported appeal is, therefore, sustained, and the case remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 201, 143 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 685, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sahm-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.