Sahara Gonzales v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Child
This text of 2023 Ark. App. 445 (Sahara Gonzales v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 445 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-23-165
Opinion Delivered October 4, 2023 SAHARA GONZALES APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FORT SMITH DISTRICT ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN [NO. 66FJV-21-56] SERVICES AND MINOR CHILD APPELLEES HONORABLE SHANNON L. BLATT, JUDGE
AFFIRMED
MIKE MURPHY, Judge
This is a companion case to Gonzales v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 2023
Ark. App. 444, also handed down today. In both cases, the Sebastian County Circuit Court
terminated appellant Sahara Gonzales’s parental rights. This is an appeal from the
termination of Gonzales’s parental rights to her sixth child, MC6, born March 20, 2020.
The legal issues pertaining to all the children were addressed in a single termination petition,
hearing, and termination order. On appeal, Gonzales challenges only the court’s best-interest
finding. We affirm.
MC6 entered his siblings’ previously opened case in February 2021. The Department
exercised custody because Gonzales was using methamphetamine, she had drugs in the
home, and she failed to keep the other juveniles in counseling as required. On March 1, 2021, the circuit court held a probable-cause hearing wherein it found
that probable cause existed for the emergency order to remain in place. On April 26, the
court held an adjudication hearing and, on the basis of the parties’ stipulation, found that
MC6 was dependent-neglected due to parental unfitness. The court also found that the
allegations in the petition and accompanying affidavit were substantiated by the proof, and
it ordered that the case goal be reunification. Additionally, it ordered that MC6 be placed
with Gonzales at her residential-treatment facility, and should she leave, MC6 was not to go
with her. Further, the circuit court ordered Gonzales to follow the case plan and complete
the services enumerated therein.
The case proceeded as described in Gonzales, 2023 Ark. App. 444, and Gonzales’s
rights to her children—including MC6—were terminated on December 12, 2022. The
relevant facts, arguments, and this court’s conclusions are set forth in the companion case
and are incorporated herein. Accordingly, we affirm.
Affirmed.
GLADWIN and GRUBER, JJ., agree.
Leah Lanford, Arkansas Commission for Parent Counsel, for appellant.
Kaylee Wedgeworth, Ark. Dep’t of Human Services, Office of Chief Counsel, for
appellee.
Dana McClain, attorney ad litem for minor child.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 Ark. App. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sahara-gonzales-v-arkansas-department-of-human-services-and-minor-child-arkctapp-2023.