SAHAL v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania·Decided May 7, 2025·No. 2:23-cv-02090·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SAHAL SAHAL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-2090 v. Hon. William S. Stickman IV Hon. Maureen P. Kelly BUTLER COUNTY PRISON, et ai, Defendants.

ORDER OF COURT Pro se Plaintiff Sahal Sahal, previously a prisoner in the custody of the Butler County Prison in Butler, Pennsylvania, and now in federal custody, brought this action against the prison and its employees. Due to multiple deficiencies throughout this case, Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly issued deficiency orders. (ECF Nos. 3, 7). Plaintiff eventually complied, and Magistrate Judge Kelly issued a Case Management Order on June 11, 2024, after which the case moved to the discovery phase. (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff failed to file his Pretrial Statement or Motion for Summary Judgment, and he failed to respond to Magistrate Judge Kelly’s show case order. (ECF No. 25). He also failed to respond to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 29-31). Magistrate Judge Kelly issued a Report and Recommendation in which, after considering and weighing the Poulis! factors, she recommended dismissal of the case without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 33).

‘Tn Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit set forth a six-factor balancing test to guide a district court in determining whether a case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

The parties were provided the opportunity to file objections, and no objections have been filed. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Kelly’s Report and Recommendation as its Opinion. It concurs with her thorough legal analysis and conclusions. AND NOW, this □□□ day of May 2025, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pending motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 29 and 32) are TERMINATED AS MOOT. BY THE COURT: ~ | Ge DMA eee WILLIAM S. STICKMAN IV UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAHAL v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON, (W.D. Pa. 2025).

SAHAL v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON (SAHAL v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related