Sahakian v. City of Los Angeles

267 P. 571, 91 Cal. App. 737, 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 935
California Court of Appeal·Decided May 14, 1928·No. Docket No. 4884.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Plaintiff states in his opening brief in his appeal herein that defendant City of Los Angeles *Page 738 filed a general demurrer to his complaint, which the trial court sustained without granting him leave to amend, and that "our only alternative is this appeal." [1] From this statement we understand that he attempts to appeal from the order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend, and his notice of appeal shows that he appeals from the order and not from the judgment thereon. Such order is not one from which an appeal lies. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.; People v. Goodell, 72 Cal.App. 452 [237 P. 829]; 2 Cal. Jur. 156.)

The attorney for appellants in this case was substituted after the appeal was taken, and after the briefs were filed.

The appeal is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sahakian v. City of Los Angeles, 267 P. 571, 91 Cal. App. 737, 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 935 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928).

267 P. 571 (Sahakian v. City of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bekins v. S. Co. v. State of California
28 P.2d 61 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Christensen v. Lucerne Holding Co.
25 P.2d 261 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc.
13 P.2d 972 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)