Sahadeo v. Department of the Navy
This text of 653 F. App'x 220 (Sahadeo v. Department of the Navy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[221]*221Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anthony Sahadeo appeals the district court’s order granting the Navy’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sahadeo’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Sahadeo has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
653 F. App'x 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sahadeo-v-department-of-the-navy-ca4-2016.