Sagona v. Roth

283 A.D.2d 582, 724 N.Y.S.2d 904, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5339

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Massapequa Park, dated August 10, 1999, denying the petitioners’ application for a variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), entered March 21, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the petition. The respondents’ determination was rational and was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Khan v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 87 NY2d 344, 351-352; Matter of Johnson v Village of Westhampton Beach, 244 AD2d 335). Bracken, P. J., O’Brien, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sagona v. Roth, 283 A.D.2d 582, 724 N.Y.S.2d 904, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 582 (Sagona v. Roth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Khan v. Zoning Board of Appeals
662 N.E.2d 782 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Johnson v. Village of Westhampton Beach
244 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)