Sager v. Myers

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sager v. Myers. Read the opinion of the Court — 328 Or. 528 →

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided November 12, 1999·No. S46812·Published

Opinion

Filed: November 12, 1999

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

JAMES SAGER,

Petitioner,

HARDY MYERS, Attorney General,
State of Oregon,

Respondent.

(SC S46812)

En Banc

On petition to review ballot title.

Argued and submitted October 19, 1999.

Margaret S. Olney, of Smith, Gamson, Diamond & Olney, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner.

Brendan C. Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the answering memorandum were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review of ballot title is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Filed: November 12, 1999

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

JAMES SAGER,

Petitioner,

HARDY MYERS, Attorney General,
State of Oregon,

Respondent.

(SC S46812)

En Banc

On petition to review ballot title.

Argued and submitted October 19, 1999.

Margaret S. Olney, of Smith, Gamson, Diamond & Olney, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review of ballot title is dismissed as moot.

Sager v. Myers, (Or. 1999).

Pincite

Sager v. Myers (Sager v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.