Sager-Spuck Supply Co. v. Ter Bush & Powell, Inc.
This text of 240 A.D. 745 (Sager-Spuck Supply Co. v. Ter Bush & Powell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents, and votes to reverse the judgment and order and to dismiss the complaint, on the ground that there is no enforcible contract, and that the letter upon which liability is predicated constitutes a mere nudum pactum. (Carpenter v. Taylor, 164 N. Y. 171.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sager-spuck-supply-co-v-ter-bush-powell-inc-nyappdiv-1933.