Sager-Spuck Supply Co. v. Ter Bush & Powell, Inc.

240 A.D. 745

This text of 240 A.D. 745 (Sager-Spuck Supply Co. v. Ter Bush & Powell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sager-Spuck Supply Co. v. Ter Bush & Powell, Inc., 240 A.D. 745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents, and votes to reverse the judgment and order and to dismiss the complaint, on the ground that there is no enforcible contract, and that the letter upon which liability is predicated constitutes a mere nudum pactum. (Carpenter v. Taylor, 164 N. Y. 171.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carpenter v. . Taylor
58 N.E. 53 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sager-spuck-supply-co-v-ter-bush-powell-inc-nyappdiv-1933.