Sageman v. Weir

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Sageman v. Weir

109 N.Y.S. 43

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 109 N.Y.S. 43 (Sageman v. Weir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sageman v. Weir, 109 N.Y.S. 43 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinions

GILDERSLEEVE, P. J.

The judgment rendered by the trial court shows that it was found, as a matter of fact, that the minds of the parties met in the agreement embraced in the receipt, so that its terms constitute the contract between the parties. This conclusion is supported by the evidence, and the case, therefore, falls within the rule laid down in Bernstein v. Weir, 40 Misc. Rep. 635, 83 N. Y. Supp. 48.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent

BISCHOFF, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GILDERSLEEVE, P. J.

The judgment rendered by the trial court shows that it was found, as a matter of fact, that the minds of the parties met in the agreement embraced in the receipt, so that its terms constitute the contract between the parties. This conclusion is supported by the evidence, and the case, therefore, falls within the rule laid down in Bernstein v. Weir, 40 Misc. Rep. 635, 83 N. Y. Supp. 48.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent

BISCHOFF, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 N.Y.S. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sageman-v-weir-nyappterm-1908.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack