Sage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

70 N.Y. 220, 1877 N.Y. LEXIS 612
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 19, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 70 N.Y. 220 (Sage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., 70 N.Y. 220, 1877 N.Y. LEXIS 612 (N.Y. 1877).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Bailway Co. is a domestic and not a foreign corporation, and hence that chap. 165, S. L. of 1842, has no application to this case, but to the transfer agents of such corporations. Being subject to the duties and obligations of the laws relating to domestic corporations, it comes within the provisions of the Bevised Statutes, vol. 1, Edm. ed., 558, which contains special provisions in regard to the *223 books containing the names of stockholders and authorizes an examination of the same within thirty days previous to any election of directors, etc.

We concur with the opinion of the General Term, that this statute does not deprive the stockholder of a corporation of the right to examine its transfer books for proper purposes and on proper occasions at other times, and a proceeding by mandamus may be invoked for the purpose of enforcing such right. But the exercise of the power of the court in granting a mandamus is discretionary, and when the General Term has held that such discretion has been properly exercised in refusing the writ, we are not at liberty to interfere with their decision. It has repeatedly been held in kindred cases by this court, that no appeal lies from such an order of the General Term, and such being the fact, and as the relator had no statutory rights to the writ, the appeal must be dismissed with costs.

All concur, except Rapallo, J., taking no part.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steckler v. Pennroad Corp.
136 F.2d 197 (Third Circuit, 1943)
In re New York Central Railroad
233 A.D. 123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Northern Central Railway Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.
136 A. 66 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1927)
Blue Ridge Power Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.
115 S.E. 306 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)
People v. American Press Ass'n
148 A.D. 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Kimball v. Dern
116 P. 28 (Utah Supreme Court, 1911)
Venner v. Chicago City Railway Co.
92 N.E. 643 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1910)
In re Cooley's Estate
98 N.Y.S. 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
In re Pierson
28 Misc. 726 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)
People ex rel. Hoffman v. Tedcastle
34 N.Y.S. 257 (Superior Court of New York, 1895)
People ex rel. Hoffman v. Tedcastle
68 N.Y. St. Rep. 135 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1895)
People ex rel. New York Underground Railway Co. v. Newton
4 Silv. Ct. App. 414 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)
St. Stephen Church Cases
25 Abb. N. Cas. 230 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1890)
Babcock v. Schuylkill & Lehigh Valley Railway Co.
9 N.Y.S. 845 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Lyon v. American Screw Company
17 A. 61 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1889)
People ex rel. McDonald v. U. S. Mercantile Rep, Co.
20 Abb. N. Cas. 192 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Stettauer v. New York & Scranton Construction Co.
42 N.J. Eq. 46 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 N.Y. 220, 1877 N.Y. LEXIS 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sage-v-lake-shore-michigan-southern-railway-co-ny-1877.