Sage v. Burton

New York Supreme Court

Sage v. Burton

24 N.Y.S. 130, 70 Hun 600, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 671

DecidedJuly 8, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 24 N.Y.S. 130 (Sage v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sage v. Burton, 24 N.Y.S. 130, 70 Hun 600, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 671 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

The defendant failed to show any authority in Abbott to indorse the check. On the contrary, it appeared that he had no such power. Certainly, without any proof of error or mistake in plaintiffs’ account, which is admitted by the answer, he was not shown to have possessed any power, as agent of plaintiffs, to receive a check for $100 less than plaintiffs’ conceded account in payment thereof. The check with which defendant claims to have paid the account set out in the complaint was produced on the trial by defendant, with a forged indorsement, and hence was then in defendant’s possession, unpaid. We think defendant did not show payment of plaintiffs’ conceded account, and hence that it was error to nonsuit. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM.

The defendant failed to show any authority in Abbott to indorse the check. On the contrary, it appeared that he had no such power. Certainly, without any proof of error or mistake in plaintiffs’ account, which is admitted by the answer, he was not shown to have possessed any power, as agent of plaintiffs, to receive a check for $100 less than plaintiffs’ conceded account in payment thereof. The check with which defendant claims to have paid the account set out in the complaint was produced on the trial by defendant, with a forged indorsement, and hence was then in defendant’s possession, unpaid. We think defendant did not show payment of plaintiffs’ conceded account, and hence that it was error to nonsuit. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 N.Y.S. 130, 70 Hun 600, 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sage-v-burton-nysupct-1893.