SAGARO EX REL. SAGARO v. Diaz
11 So. 3d 403, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4202, 2009 WL 1212069
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying Michael Sagaro’s petition, on behalf of his minor daughters, for a permanent injunction for protection against domestic violence. We affirm because the claims of evidentiary error were not properly preserved in the trial court below, see Clock v. Clock, 649 So.2d 312, 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), and do not constitute fundamental error. See Saka v. Saka, 831 So.2d 709, 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
SAGARO EX REL. SAGARO v. Diaz, 11 So. 3d 403, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4202, 2009 WL 1212069 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
11 So. 3d 403 (SAGARO EX REL. SAGARO v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clock v. Clock
649 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Saka v. Saka
831 So. 2d 709 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)