Sagarino v. Manhattan General, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sagarino v. Manhattan General, Inc.

255 A.D. 771, 7 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5194

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 21, 1938·Published

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, without prejudice. Rule 122 [of the Rules of Civil Practice] and sections 289 and 290 of the Civil Practice Act state the manner in which applications of this character must be made. The failure of plaintiffs to comply with the statute and the rules requires the reversal of this order. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, without prejudice. Rule 122 [of the Rules of Civil Practice] and sections 289 and 290 of the Civil Practice Act state the manner in which applications of this character must be made. The failure of plaintiffs to comply with the statute and the rules requires the reversal of this order. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Sagarino v. Manhattan General, Inc., 255 A.D. 771, 7 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 771 (Sagarino v. Manhattan General, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.