Saga Vs. Hakopyan

489 P.3d 923
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided July 14, 2021·No. 82570·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RICHARD SAGA, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 82570 SOPHIE IDEKER, AN INDIVIDUAL; MARK MIYAQKA, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND ROBERT TANKO, INDIVIDUAL, Appellants,

vs. FIL GARNIK HAKOPYAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, JUL 1 k 2021 Res ondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to set aside a default judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Timothy C. Williams, Judge.

When our preliminary review of the docketing statement and the NRAP 3(g) documents revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we directed appellants to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, it appears the notice of appeal is untimely from the only appealable order. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c); NRAP4 (a)(4)(C). The order to show cause cautioned appellants that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in the dismissal

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

411) i 047A 4Spito

of this appeal. Appellants response was due to be filed on or before May 27, 2021.

To date, appellants have failed to respond to the order to show cause or to otherwise demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, it appears we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Cadish

J.

-4111

‘4141'

RIAti

J.

Herndon

cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge The Law Offices of Curtiss S. Chamberlain Wiley Petersen Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 I 947A oglep

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saga Vs. Hakopyan, 489 P.3d 923 (Neb. 2021).

489 P.3d 923 (Saga Vs. Hakopyan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.