Saga Restaurant Corp. v. National Comfort Control Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Saga Restaurant Corp. v. National Comfort Control Corp.

54 A.D.2d 711, 387 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14301

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 711 (Saga Restaurant Corp. v. National Comfort Control Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saga Restaurant Corp. v. National Comfort Control Corp., 54 A.D.2d 711, 387 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover for damage to property, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 7, 1975, which is in favor of defendants and against it, upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case, at a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. No fact findings were presented for review. Plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of every favorable inference which could reasonably be drawn from the facts to sustain the complaint. On the facts herein, a prima facie case was established. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover for damage to property, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 7, 1975, which is in favor of defendants and against it, upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case, at a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. No fact findings were presented for review. Plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of every favorable inference which could reasonably be drawn from the facts to sustain the complaint. On the facts herein, a prima facie case was established. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 711, 387 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saga-restaurant-corp-v-national-comfort-control-corp-nyappdiv-1976.