Safwan (Amir) Vs. State
This text of Safwan (Amir) Vs. State (Safwan (Amir) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
AMIR SAFWAN, A/K/A JACKIE No. 79702 REYNOLDS, Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. OCT 3 2019 ELI/ABE-IN A. BROWN CLERK OF SAPREME COURT BY S • Y...C9.6.4.6t DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for additional credit for time served. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for additional credit for time served, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Pidett , J. Pickering
, J. Parraguirre Cadish
SUPREME CouRT oF NEVADA
(0) 1947A )4 - 7 cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Amir Safwan Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Safwan (Amir) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safwan-amir-vs-state-nev-2019.