Safwan (Amir) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 23, 2019·No. 79702·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

AMIR SAFWAN, A/K/A JACKIE No. 79702 REYNOLDS,

Appellant,

vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent. OCT 3 2019 ELI/ABE-IN A. BROWN

CLERK OF SAPREME COURT BY S • Y...C9.6.4.6t

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for additional credit for time served. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for additional credit for time served, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Pidett , J.

Pickering

, J.

Parraguirre Cadish

SUPREME CouRT oF NEVADA

(0) 1947A )4 - 7

cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Amir Safwan Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Safwan (Amir) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Safwan (Amir) Vs. State (Safwan (Amir) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)